Revitalise Parramatta Road without overdevelopment


Parramatta Road Urban Renewal
UrbanGrowth NSW
PO Box 237
PARRAMATTA  NSW  2124

Submission: Draft Parramatta Road Urban Transformation Strategy

I write to strongly object to your proposals to over-develop our local community. The Draft Parramatta Road Urban Transformation Strategy seeks to increase the amount of housing from 736 homes to 6,014 in the three Inner West precincts of Taverners Hill, Leichhardt and Camperdown. This will produce close to a tenfold increase in population from 1,515 to almost 11,000.

This is an unnecessary and overwhelming imposition on the local community. It will make public transport less accessible, overwhelm local services and destroy what is special about our community. 

The Inner West is already exceeding new housing requirements. Leichhardt Council, as an example, has a target set by the government’s Sydney Metropolitan Plan to deliver 2,400 new homes between 2005 and 2036. The Leichhardt Council area will have almost 1,800 new dwellings by the end of this year, already meeting its 2030 target which is 15 years ahead of schedule! The 2036 target will be easily met without imposing more than 5,500 new dwellings. 

The draft strategy says more about the influence of the powerful developer lobby pushing for new development sites than proper strategic planning for a more liveable city.

[please add further comments below to personalise your submission]

170 SIGNATURES
GOAL: 300 signatures

Will you make a Submission?









Like this to spread the word:

Showing 113 reactions

  • Daniel Sirone
    signed 2015-12-11 14:41:59 +1100
  • Rolf Wood
    signed 2015-12-11 14:39:34 +1100
    Having worked at Petersham for many years, and knowing the local area well, I am very much aware of the chaos this massive over-development will cause.
  • Glen Rothwell
    signed 2015-12-11 14:29:39 +1100
    high density housing creates ghettos – especially where there are not the jobs or infrastructure to support. This needs to be better thought out / planned….it’s not enough to provide over priced little boxes that only make developers or overseas investors rich. Focus on sustainable communities not high rise eyesores and short sighted lobby group agendas.
  • Elizabeth Clement
    signed 2015-12-11 14:24:50 +1100
  • Susanne Fletcher
    signed 2015-12-11 14:23:21 +1100
  • richard dudlley-smith
    signed 2015-12-11 14:20:17 +1100
    This is just one part of the Baird government’s plan to flog off the whole of the Inner West to property developers. It has nothing to do with required housing, this was all carefully worked out in the early 2000s in a consultative way involving the government and all councils. Liechhardt council has already met the required target for new properties that are required by 2030. The Government spin that 1000s of new residences are required in the Liechhardt area are totally untrue and the forced destruction of so many people’s home is an outrageous scandal. All the Baird policies are inter connected, the forced council amalgamations, the Westconnex, the redevelopment of Parramatta Road. These policies will totally destroy the Inner West and other areas as well They are totally mad policies created by people who have no interest in addressing commuters requirements, have no aesthetic appreciation of Sydney or of preserving the beauty of it or sensitively creating for its future, they are only interested in flogging off everything they can to the private sector. It’s all about money and greed and disenfranchising the people and as far as possible making sure they are totally uninformed of what is being proposed. The crazy WestConnex is part of this plan a plan that Baird’s deluded father tried to bring about in the 1970s which would have destroyed Glebe. It was a stupid outmoded plan then and it is ten times more so today when the whole world has realised that vast road systems in cities don’t work. What is needed in Sydney is a public transport system akin to the the London Underground system that moves millions of people a day and means that vast swathes of the city are not destroyed for the construction of vast inappropriate roads and hideous cheaply constructed high rise which is what is being proposed . Sydney is a city not a country town, it needs a proper professional public transport system with every effort made to preserve the beauty of Sydney rather than destroy it.
  • Jo Hobson
    signed 2015-12-11 13:59:30 +1100
    I also have two specific objections regarding the Taverners Hill Precinct proposals:


    (1) lack of open green space and (2) the impact of higher population on the light rail system between Dulwich Hill to Central.


    1) Lack of open green space in Taverners Hill Precinct and misleading information on map provided by Urban Growth:


    i) The proposed open space on Cook St is a townhouse.


    ii) The existing open space on Tebbutt St is a school yard.


    iii) The proposed open space at the end of various streets, eg. Lords Street is existing bush area.


    iv) The open space called ‘Richard Murden Reserve’ is in Haberfield and has been incorrectly located into Taverners Hill Precinct; it is on the other side of Marion Street.


    v) The large green space of Lambert Park & Sports Field is misleading as 2/3 of this space is for the Sports Field which is often closed and a 1/3 is Lambert Park.


    The Taverners Hill Precinct desperately needs more open green spaces and sporting fields not a higher population.


    2) Urban Growth says the proposed high rise apartments are to be located near the light rail as it will provide public transport.


    The light rail is already at capacity during peak hours and

    soon will have to cope with an extra population due to 1,500 apartments currently been built at the Lewisham West light rail stop – the next light rail stop to Taverners Hill.


    The Taverners Hill Precinct desperately needs more public transport not a higher population.
  • Catherine Sutcliffe
    signed 2015-12-11 13:59:28 +1100
    We need to maintain our distinct village culture and develop appropriately. I use a bicycle,my only form on transport. More traffic will be very dangerous if not well planned to accomodate all forms of transport
  • Vsevolod Vlaskine
    signed 2015-12-11 13:57:21 +1100
  • Nadia Warne
    signed 2015-12-11 13:51:03 +1100
  • Pauline Lee
    signed 2015-12-11 13:46:08 +1100
  • Rowena Cseh
    signed 2015-12-11 13:45:36 +1100
  • Rosa Ochoa
    posted about this on Facebook 2015-12-11 13:41:16 +1100
    Sign the petition: Revitalise Parramatta Road without overdevelopment
  • Rosa Ochoa
    @rosao tweeted link to this page. 2015-12-11 13:41:13 +1100
    Sign the petition: Revitalise Parramatta Road without overdevelopment http://www.jamieparker.org/parraroad_submission?recruiter_id=69278
  • Azraella Raphael
    signed 2015-12-11 13:40:52 +1100
  • Rosa Ochoa
    signed 2015-12-11 13:40:39 +1100
  • Penelope McCulloch
    signed 2015-12-11 13:34:43 +1100
  • David Bubb
    signed 2015-12-11 13:32:39 +1100
    The transport system cant cope now, the parks are crowded its just too many. Use your brains.
  • William Beattie
    signed 2015-12-11 13:29:30 +1100
    I travel Parramatta road often for various personal and professional reasons. I support the greens urban proposal as more citizen oriented rather than pro developer in which name so many urban / suburban and regional developments have been disastrous. Forget the past and one robs the future.
  • Cassi Plate
    signed 2015-12-11 13:23:34 +1100
    The proposed level of development is completely out of character with the Taverners Hill, Leichhardt and Camperdown precincts. There are no plans for increased open space, and West Leichhardt has some of the lowest levels of open space in the whole of Australia, and no plans for more public transport or schools. This is clearly a land grab by developers, in conjunction with the appalling proposals for WestConnex. Leichhardt is proceeding with necessary urban densification in appropriate ways; 12-storey buildings are not appropriate development.
  • Jonathan Marshall
    signed 2015-12-11 13:19:30 +1100
    The State Government seems bent on enforcing changes to people’s residential areas with little in the way of consultation, and little in the way of increased infrastructure to cope with the extra people; such as schools, hospitals, open space or public transport.


    It is clear that people in the Leichhardt area already have high density living in terms of population density. Why is this being increased at the cost of local residents? Why are property rights being abrogated?


    The massive changes that are being proposed require full debate in Parliament, and full openness of planning and proposals. People need as much access to government as developers.
  • Jack Dempsey
    signed 2015-12-11 13:18:28 +1100
  • Pablo Leighton
    signed 2015-12-11 13:17:20 +1100