How dangerous are smoke stacks?

Smoke stacks (also called exhaust stacks, pollution stacks or ventilation stacks) have been in the news recently regarding both the WestConnex toll road and the Beaches Link. But what are they, and could they be harmful?

What's a smoke stack? What does it look like?

Here's what the NSW Chief Scientist says about smoke stacks:

Many road tunnels vent exhaust air to the atmosphere at the exit portals. However, in busier or longer tunnels (typically those longer than 2km) emissions can build up to levels where in-tunnel air quality exceeds acceptable limits. In such cases, ventilation stacks have often been used to increase the throughput of fresh air, effectively increasing the allowable vehicle capacity.

Put simply, smoke stacks are chimneys that carry polluted air from road tunnels into the outside environment.

Initial plans submitted for a smoke stack at Haberfield suggested it would be 26 metres high. This is a photo of a smoke stack for the M5 motorway at Turrella:


Will the stacks be filtered to remove toxic gases from the air?

No. As a matter of policy by both Labor and Liberal governments, no tunnel ventilation stacks in NSW are filtered.

The former NSW Labor government ignored the huge campaign to filter the M5 tollways and still has refuses to have a policy to filter all smokestacks.

The Liberal government has exactly the same policy for the tollways they are proposing.

No reasons are given for this policy that stand up to proper analysis.

How have the government decided if the level of pollution from the stacks will be dangerous?

Predicted air pollution from smoke stacks and roads is measured against the ambient air quality standards decided by the National Environment Protection Measure, which was set up in the 1990s by environment ministers who formed a political agreement on air quality standards.

Australia therefore has lower air quality standards than the global standards set by the World Health Organisation. Australian standards are not always updated in line with the latest scientific research from around the world. 

How will pollution from stacks be measured? 

Air pollution is measured by Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) as part of the operation of the stack ventilation system. Pollution levels are measured inside the stacks, but it’s not possible to measure the actual impact of stack emissions on the ground.

No clear evidence exists to show that monitoring the ambient air quality, as RMS has done can reliably predict the size, nature and course of adverse health impacts of air from tunnels. Air from tunnels is very different from ambient air, and much more complicated

Air pollution is often difficult to measure and many pollutants interact with the weather, meaning measurements just 100 metres apart can be very different.

What pollutants are they measuring?

Inside the smoke stacks, RMS measures carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and so-called PM10 particles – these are solid and liquid particles smaller than 10 micrometres (0.01 mm) in diameter.

Ground level pollution monitoring around smoke stacks has measured carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and PM10 particles.

However the smallest particles – known as ultrafine particles - contained in diesel exhaust fumes are not specifically measured, and are not accurately estimated by any of the measurements done by the RMS.

These ultrafine particles are the most harmful. These are the particles which actually go into the lungs, and the finest of the ultrafine particles can even get inside the cells of the lungs.

What health risks are associated with air pollution?

Polluting the air kills people much like selling them cigarettes or asbestos. The more pollutants in the air we breathe and the longer we breathe them, the greater the risks to health.

Medical research confirms that pollutants from diesel exhaust cause lung cancer, bladder cancer, heart disease, heart attacks, strokes, asthma attacks, and lung damage in children.

The experts from the International Agency for Research in Cancer of the World Health Organisation classified diesel exhaust as a Group 1A carcinogen – in the same group of cancer causing agents as arsenic and mustard gas.

What's a safe level of pollution from smoke stacks?

The latest World Health Organisation air quality guidelines state, “There is little evidence to suggest a threshold below which no adverse health effects would be anticipated",  and an international workshop of multiple pollution experts in 2009 concluded, “There are no established thresholds of exposure below which population health impacts are absent.”

In other words, there is NO level at which air pollution is completely safe, especially for more vulnerable people, children, and the elderly.

So what's the solution?

WestConnex as a project should be scrapped. It poses serious health risks, as well as inducing more cars onto the roads, increasing air pollution and contributing to global warming. It will destroy communities and wipe out much needed green spaces.



Showing 4 reactions

  • Bernard Mooney
    commented 2018-03-04 00:37:29 +1100
    Just when we a winning the Anti Smoking Lobby this government finds a way to put far more of a far worse Polutant into our lungs and get tax $’s from Petrocarbons Not Cigarettes! Disgusting!
  • Peter Temby
    commented 2017-11-04 13:50:35 +1100
    Pollution of all sorts has been estimated to cause over 9 million premature deaths globally per year, or 16% of all global deaths (Lancet Commission into Pollution and Health, 2017).

    Air pollution is responsible for 72% of all pollution deaths and is therefore responsible for more deaths than a high-sodium diet (4·1 million), obesity (4·0 million), alcohol (2·3 million), road accidents (1·4 million), or child and maternal malnutrition (1·4 million). Pollution was also responsible for three times as many deaths as AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria combined and for nearly 15 times as many deaths as war, terrorism and all other forms of violence.

    In addition to the deaths there are also large losses of productive life due to disability caused by pollution.

    It would seem to be rational to spend a lot more effort on prevention of deaths from air pollution rather than on prevention of very minor causes of death which dominate the news. Minor causes of death are being exploited in the politics of fear, spread by politicians world wide.

    To have poor quality air pollution controls on tunnels in a supposedly advanced country is totally unacceptable and additionally makes no economic sense. The US Environmental Protection Agency found in 2011 that every dollar invested in control of ambient air pollution in the USA not only improves health, but also is estimated to yield US$30 in economic benefits.

    In many respects the US is comparable to Australia in control of air pollution so the positive effect on the economy is a benefit we miss out on in Australia due to poor economic management and indifference to the health effects on Australians.

    It is unacceptable to allow new major infrastructure to be constructed without proper safeguards and it is also economically irresponsible to not look at the impact on health costs and other economic costs of poorly planned infrastructure.
  • Beverley Atkinson
    commented 2017-07-29 17:44:10 +1000
    Consider the 1996 alternative to the beaches tunnel, approved by Mr Carr; the train linking (Parramatta) Epping, Chatswood and Dee Why: no smokestacks.

    This heavy rail extension to the existing network was would be taking thousands of cars off the roads, and allowing non-drivers to travel independently (fewer cars needed by families), It would be fulfilling the real pent up demand.. not radially to the old City,that’s old hat.. but peripherally East-West, where no railways exist, and no direct roads (in contrast to the liberally supplied south shore of the Harbour).

    This essential rail link needs to be re-introduced. Only the Olympics stopped it happening.
    It has underground sections to keep the tunnel boring machines busy, (a great Government Desire!?) but the tunnels they dig will be useful links; they will connect people to homes via stations, encourage compact development and nature retention, and they would not pollute air inside, or near, the tunnels.

    Reference: Option 2, Section 22 Committee, 1994 and 1995.
  • Daphne Storm
    commented 2017-07-21 19:26:00 +1000
    Were flyovers ever considered? With tunnels obviously the exhaust has to go somewhere – but such a health hazard with smoke stakes. There has to be a better environmentally safer solution.

Follow Jamie


Join 23,896 other supporters in taking action


Sandra completed the survey: "What's Your Opinion On The Lockout Laws?".


Maria signed up to volunteer for Jamie

Share this page